- UIT is faster and more efficient than hammer peening when used to treat welds, by at least 2x.
- UIT is easier for the operator to control due to less vibration and force being required (1/8 as much force).
- UIT is a more accurate treatment than hammer peening, because the indenter travels only 30 microns versus 1/4 inch for hammer peening.
- UIT is lighter and more portable, and it can access areas hammer peening cannot.
- UIT produces significantly less noise. It is 20% quieter than hammer peening.
- UIT allows for better process control, because treatment variables are controlled by PLC, as opposed to man + air compressor for hammer peening.
- UIT can be machine or robotic mounted for use in manufacturing.
- UIT can produce a surface finish equal to rough machining.
In summary, UIT achieves equal or better results than hammer peening, with what is clearly a superior process.